felinejumper: A topless woman slumped on a book and looking at a cat (0)
felinejumper ([personal profile] felinejumper) wrote 2018-12-17 12:14 am (UTC)

Oooh, this has spurred so many threads, I will have to contemplate additions/clarifications/a long author's note up top.

...serve both as mirrors to humanity, and also as kind of our conceptual descendants/creations.
I don't have fully formed thoughts on this yet, but it makes me wonder whether there is a broad statement about different kinds of spec-fic -- is genetic speculation (Atwood, Butler) serving the same purpose in mirroring/creation? I feel like maybe there is something about which viewpoints are prioritized in different kinds of spec-fic?

[We can't count] on TV for really revolutionary speculative fiction stories, though.
I largely agree with this, for the reasons you mentioned, and actually regret not thinking about that more -- how much of what I'm mad about is just a fundamental limitation of the current production environment? And since I'm comparing books to movies/TV, is it just my general bias for the former? Or because I am specifically interested in robotic internal v. external lives and I think those will always be done best in a book?

Do you think that TV can't do any revolutionary fiction, or is there something specific to spec-fic. that is out of reach? It will be maaaybe interesting to see what comes out of the current boom in spec-fic TV, although I have, as you might guess, been underwhelmed so far.



Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting